Murdoch Family Drama Heads to Secretive Court Battle Over Control of Media Empire

Murdoch Family Drama Heads to Secretive Court Battle Over Control of Media Empire

RFF Editor4 min read

Somewhere in Reno, Nevada, inside a domed courthouse that looks more suited to settling water rights than reshaping the global information order, a man named Edmund J. Gorman Jr. is about to become the most consequential figure in media that almost nobody has heard of. Gorman is a county probate commissioner. He works out of the high desert. He keeps a low profile. And in the coming weeks, the future of Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and a sprawling newspaper portfolio stretching from London to Sydney will land squarely on his desk.

The case before him is, on paper, a family trust dispute. In practice, it is a cage match over the soul of a media empire that has bent elections, toppled prime ministers, and rewired the politics of at least three continents. Rupert Murdoch, the 93-year-old patriarch who built that empire from a single Adelaide newspaper, wants to rewrite the rules of succession. He wants his eldest son, Lachlan, to inherit sole control of the family's companies after his death, cutting his other three eldest children -- Prudence, Elisabeth, and James -- out of the power equation entirely.

To do that, Murdoch needs Gorman to approve changes to a two-decade-old irrevocable trust established after his divorce from his second wife, Anna Murdoch Mann. As it stands, that trust gives equal voting power over the controlling shares of the family's companies to all four of Murdoch's eldest children. The patriarch wants to blow up that arrangement and hand the keys to Lachlan alone. His other children have, predictably and ferociously, said no.

The proceedings will be invisible. Gorman sealed the case -- filed under the wonderfully anonymous title Doe 1 Trust, PR23-00813 -- despite pushback from media organizations arguing that a trust controlling major publicly traded companies deserves public scrutiny. Gorman disagreed. Under Nevada's sealing statutes, he ruled, a family trust remains a private legal arrangement, no matter how many satellite dishes and printing presses it happens to own.

Rupert Murdoch flanked by sons Lachlan and James arriving at St Bride's church in London in March 2016

Media mogul Rupert Murdoch (center) with sons Lachlan (left) and James arriving at St Bride's church for a service celebrating Murdoch's wedding to former supermodel Jerry Hall, London, March 5, 2016. (Photo: REUTERS/Peter Nicholls)

A family feud over Fox News' future

This is not simply a fight over who gets the corner office. It is a fight over what Fox News becomes after its creator is gone -- and by extension, what American conservatism sounds like on television for the next generation.

Lachlan Murdoch has made his loyalties clear. Like his father, he has steered Fox News toward the populist, right-wing posture that turned the network into a political force and, occasionally, a political liability. James Murdoch has gone the other direction entirely, publicly criticizing the network's role in amplifying disinformation, including false claims about the 2020 U.S. election.

The math is stark. If Rupert Murdoch wins in Reno and the trust is rewritten, Lachlan inherits unilateral control over the company's political and editorial direction. If Murdoch loses, his other three children could outvote Lachlan, potentially steering Fox News and the broader empire toward the center -- or further still.

The confrontation had been building for years, but it detonated late last year when Murdoch moved in secret to alter the trust's terms. The maneuver reportedly blindsided Elisabeth, James, and Prudence. They responded by challenging the changes in Nevada probate court, where the entire matter now sits in Gorman's lap.

--> Click here to read the next article in this series -- Murdoch Family Feud

Rupert Murdoch and his wife walking through a crowd of reporters outside a courtroom

Rupert Murdoch and his wife navigate a gauntlet of reporters outside the courtroom. (Photo: Associated Press)

A long legal road ahead

Starting Monday, Rupert Murdoch and his children will file into the courtroom before Gorman for five days of testimony. Gorman, a Stanford Law graduate with a reputation for thoroughness and an almost fanatical commitment to confidentiality, will hear their arguments and then issue a recommendation. That recommendation is not the final word -- it still requires sign-off from one of Nevada's probate judges -- but it will set the trajectory for everything that follows.

Gorman has already drawn fire for sealing the proceedings. Media organizations have argued that a case with this much public consequence deserves daylight. Gorman has not budged, citing Nevada's privacy laws that tilt heavily toward secrecy in family trust matters.

Even after Gorman hands down his recommendation, the losing side can appeal, potentially dragging the dispute out for years. Probate lawyer Molly LeGoy has noted that family trust battles tend to be especially drawn out when powerful dynasties are involved. "When family dynamics are involved, there's always the potential for more venom -- and more legal action," she says.

The Murdochs have never been strangers to family turbulence. But this fight is different. The outcome will determine not just who sits atop one of the largest media conglomerates on earth, but what that conglomerate says, who it supports, and how it shapes the information landscape for years to come. The next chapter of the Murdoch empire's story is being written right now -- behind sealed doors, in a courthouse in the Nevada desert, by a probate commissioner most of the world has never heard of.

--> Click here to read the next article in this series -- Murdoch Family Feud

#murdoch #nevada
Share

Related Stories