Rupert Murdoch Loses Court Case to Change Family Trust

A 93-year-old media titan just got told no

Rupert Murdoch, the man who spent half a century bending governments, launching wars on newsprint, and building one of the most powerful conservative media machines on earth, just lost a fight to his own family trust. A Nevada commissioner ruled that Murdoch's attempt to rewrite the terms of that trust and hand sole control to his eldest son Lachlan was conducted in "bad faith" -- a phrase that, according to a sealed court document obtained by The New York Times, barely scratches the surface of what actually went down.

Commissioner Edmund J. Gorman Jr. filed his decision on a Saturday, and the 96-page ruling read less like a legal opinion and more like an indictment. Gorman concluded that Rupert and Lachlan had orchestrated a "carefully planned charade" to rewrite the family trust, which currently splits control equally among Murdoch's four eldest children -- Lachlan, James, Elisabeth, and Prudence -- upon Rupert's death. The scheme, Gorman wrote, was engineered to cement Lachlan as the undisputed leader of the media empire, with zero regard for what that meant for the companies or the rest of the family.

The trust was never about money

The Murdoch family tree spanning three marriages and six children, with the four eldest holding equal voting power in the trust (Photo: Rich Family Feuds)

Here is what makes this fight so volatile: nobody is arguing over a check. The war is over who gets to steer Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Post -- a collection of outlets that have shaped American conservatism for a generation. For decades, Rupert, now 93, has been obsessed with ensuring that his empire keeps its right-leaning editorial posture long after he is gone. He has made no secret of wanting Lachlan to be the one holding the wheel. But the trust, with its four-way power split, makes a clean handoff nearly impossible.

James and Elisabeth, both known for political views that sit well to the left of their father and older brother, have long been seen as the wild cards. If Rupert cannot lock Lachlan into the driver's seat, the editorial direction of the entire empire could drift after his death -- a scenario that keeps the old man up at night.

Inside the Reno courtroom

Rupert Murdoch arriving at court in Reno, Nevada, where sealed proceedings revealed the depth of the family's internal fractures (Photo: Reuters)

The drama played out across a series of closed-door sessions in Reno, Nevada, where Rupert and his children each took the stand. What leaked from those proceedings was remarkable. The Murdoch siblings had apparently been discussing their father's eventual death after watching an episode of HBO's Succession -- the fictional show famously inspired by their own family. That revelation prompted a representative for Elisabeth to draft a memo aimed at preventing the Murdochs from stumbling into their own version of the show's scorched-earth finale.

Gorman's ruling tore into Rupert and Lachlan's strategy with unusual force. He characterized their efforts as a secretive, bad-faith attempt to "stack the deck" in Lachlan's favor. He also singled out the representatives Rupert and Lachlan had appointed to the trust, noting that one of them had done little more than Google the Murdoch family and watch Succession as preparation for the role.

How the trust was built in the first place

Rupert established the family trust in 2006, giving equal voting power to his four eldest children while keeping control for himself during his lifetime. The structure was hammered out during negotiations with his second wife, Anna, and was specifically designed to prevent his younger children with third wife Wendi Deng from gaining control. Those younger kids received equal financial stakes but no voting power.

In court, Rupert and Lachlan argued that consolidating leadership under Lachlan would protect the empire's conservative editorial direction -- a move they claimed would benefit all beneficiaries. James, Elisabeth, and Prudence fired back, accusing them of trying to disenfranchise three-quarters of the family.

What happens next

Rupert's camp is not going quietly. Adam Streisand, a lawyer for Rupert and Lachlan, confirmed they plan to appeal the decision. On the other side, James, Elisabeth, and Prudence released a joint statement saying they were pleased with the ruling and hoped the family could now focus on repairing relationships.

Gorman's ruling is technically a recommendation -- it still needs approval from a district judge, and appeals could drag the case out further. If Rupert and Lachlan ultimately lose, they may explore other avenues to secure Lachlan's control, such as buying out the other siblings' stakes.

Decades of fracture lines

This legal battle did not erupt out of nowhere. The Murdoch family has been publicly splintering for years. During the phone-hacking scandal in Britain over a decade ago, Elisabeth pushed her father to fire James. But the trust fight has elevated those tensions to a different order of magnitude, exposing decades of shifting alliances, competing ideologies, and a patriarch who cannot let go of the empire he built -- even from the far side of a courtroom loss.