Rupert Murdoch is 93 years old and sitting on a $33 billion media empire that stretches from Fox News to The Wall Street Journal to The Times of London. His children are fighting over who gets to steer it when he is gone. The whole thing plays out like the HBO show that his own family supposedly inspired, except there are no writers and nobody gets to call cut.
A dynasty cracking down the middle
The Murdoch Family Trust holds the controlling shares of both News Corp and Fox Corporation, two of the most consequential media companies on the planet. For decades, Rupert ran the show unchallenged. But age and health have turned the question of succession from a distant hypothetical into an urgent, $33 billion problem.
Members of the Murdoch family, whose internal power struggle could reshape the global media landscape (Photo: Rich Family Feuds)
Lachlan Murdoch, the eldest son, is the anointed heir. He already holds the CEO title at Fox Corporation and chairs News Corp. On paper, the transition looks clean. In reality, his three siblings see things very differently. James Murdoch walked away from the family businesses in 2020, publicly citing concerns over editorial direction at Fox News. Elisabeth and Prudence have their own visions for what the empire should become. One father, four children, zero consensus.
The trust rewrite that lit the fuse
The Murdoch Family Trust was structured to eventually pass control of its shares to Rupert's children. That arrangement, in theory, would give all four siblings a seat at the table. Then Rupert moved to rewrite the rules.
According to court filings, Rupert Murdoch sought to amend the trust in a way that would cement Lachlan's authority and effectively sideline James, Elisabeth, and Prudence from meaningful decision-making. The amendment would lock in Lachlan as the singular power behind both News Corp and Fox Corporation long after Rupert's death.
That move transformed a simmering family tension into a full-blown legal war. The case landed in a Nevada probate court, with Lachlan on one side and his three siblings and their representatives on the other.
A courtroom the public cannot enter
The legal proceedings have drawn intense interest from the press and the public alike, for obvious reasons: the Murdoch media holdings shape politics and culture across multiple continents. A coalition of major news organizations, including The Washington Post and The New York Times, petitioned the court to unseal the case, arguing that the sheer influence of these companies on global affairs justified transparency.
The court disagreed. The judge ruled in favor of keeping the proceedings private, sealing the Murdoch family's internal dynamics away from public view. Whatever is being said in that courtroom about the future of Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and the rest of the empire stays behind closed doors.
What the fight actually decides
Strip away the family drama and you find a question with enormous consequences: who controls the editorial direction of Fox News and its sister properties in a post-Rupert world?
Fox News is the most-watched cable news network in the United States and a gravitational force in conservative politics. Lachlan Murdoch has largely kept it on its current course. James Murdoch has been openly uncomfortable with what he sees as the channel's divisive and partisan editorial stance.
If Lachlan prevails in the trust dispute, Fox News will almost certainly continue operating as a dominant conservative voice with the same editorial posture it has held for years. If his siblings manage to dilute that control, the network could face a significant editorial shift, one that would ripple through American media and politics in ways that are difficult to predict.
Rupert Murdoch and his wife arrive at the courthouse, navigating a swarm of reporters (Photo: Daily Mail)
The show that wrote itself
The comparisons to HBO's Succession are so persistent they have become unavoidable. The fictional Roy family, with its ruthless patriarch and scheming children locked in a war for control of a global media conglomerate, was widely understood to draw from the Murdoch saga. Rupert himself dismissed the connection, calling the show "a complete myth." Others who have watched both the series and the real-life lawsuit unfold find the similarities harder to wave away.
But this is not prestige television. This is a legal battle over one of the most powerful media empires ever assembled, fought by real people with real money and real grudges. The outcome will determine not just which Murdoch sits at the head of the table but what Fox News, News Corp, and their global portfolio of outlets say to billions of people in the years ahead. The Murdoch succession is a family feud with the volume turned up to a frequency the rest of us cannot ignore.
Related Stories
The Redstone Wars: How Shari Outlasted Her Father and Sold the Empire He Built
Sumner Redstone spent decades trying to keep his daughter away from his media empire. She got it anyway — and then sold every last piece of it for $8 billion. Along the way: a son bought out for $250 million, a companion evicted from a mansion, a CBS CEO fired in disgrace, and Donald Trump walking off with $16 million on his way to the White House.
The House of Gucci ran on blood before anyone pulled a trigger
The family that built one of the world's most recognizable luxury brands spent decades tearing each other apart — in courtrooms, boardrooms, and finally, on a Milan street. The murder of Maurizio Gucci in 1995 was the final act of a dynasty that had been killing itself for years.
The Woman Who Tried to Save Her Mother from a Billion-Dollar Con
Liliane Bettencourt was the world's richest woman — and she was being drained of a billion dollars by her best friend. Her daughter went to war to stop it, and blew up French politics in the process.